Connect with us


Video game play is positively correlated with well-being



Video game play is positively correlated with well-being


People have never played more video games, and many stakeholders are worried that this activity might be bad for players. So far, research has not had adequate data to test whether these worries are justified and if policymakers should act to regulate video game play time. We attempt to provide much-needed evidence with adequate data. Whereas previous research had to rely on self-reported play behaviour, we collaborated with two games companies, Electronic Arts and Nintendo of America, to obtain players’ actual play behaviour. We surveyed players of Plantsvs.Zombies: Battle for Neighborville and Animal Crossing: New Horizons for their well-being, motivations and need satisfaction during play, and merged their responses with telemetry data (i.e. logged game play). Contrary to many fears that excessive play time will lead to addiction and poor mental health, we found a small positive relation between game play and affective well-being. Need satisfaction and motivations during play did not interact with play time but were instead independently related to well-being. Our results advance the field in two important ways. First, we show that collaborations with industry partners can be done to high academic standards in an ethical and transparent fashion. Second, we deliver much-needed evidence to policymakers on the link between play and mental health.

1. Introduction

Video games are an immensely popular and profitable leisure activity. Last year, the revenues of the games industry were larger than the film industry’s [] and the number of people who report playing games has never been higher []. Across the globe, the rise of games as a dominant form of recreation and socializing has raised important questions about the potential effect of play on well-being. These questions concern players, parents, policymakers and scholars alike: billions of people play video games, and if this activity has positive or negative effects on well-being, playing games might have worldwide health impacts. Therefore, empirically understanding how games might help or harm players is a top priority for all stakeholders. It is possible games are neutral with respect to health and enacting policies that unnecessarily regulate play would restrict human rights to play and freedom of expression [3]. Decisions on regulating video games, or promoting it as a medium for bolstering health, thus come with high stakes and must not be made without robust scientific evidence.

Unfortunately, nearly three decades of research exploring the possible links between video games and negative outcomes including aggression, addiction, well-being and cognitive functioning have brought us nowhere near a consensus or evidence-based policy because reliable, reproducible and ecologically valid studies are few and far between (e.g. [4,5]). In recent years, researchers and policymakers have shifted focus from concerns about violent video games and aggression (e.g. ) to concerns about the association between the amount, or nature, of the time people spend playing video games and well-being (e.g. in the UK [7]). In other words, they are interested in the effect of game play behaviours on subjective well-being and by extension mental health. Yet, instead of measuring such behaviour directly, research has relied on self-reported engagement. Historically, this methodological decision has been taken on practical grounds: first, self-report is a relatively easy way to collect data about play. Second, the video games industry has in the past hesitated to work with independent scientists. As time has gone on, it has become increasingly clear that defaulting to self-report is not tenable. Recent evidence suggests self-reports of digital behaviours are notoriously imprecise and biased, which limits the conclusions we can draw from research on time spent on video games and well-being [8,9].

The lack of accurate behavioural data represents a formidable shortcoming that deprives health policymakers of the high-quality evidence they require to make informed decisions on possible regulations to the video games industry [10]. A range of solutions have been proposed including active and passive forms of online engagement [11] and measuring engagement using device telemetry (i.e. logged game play) [12,13]. Therefore, there is a need for directly measured video game behaviour to inform policymakers. To obtain such data, researchers must collaborate, in a transparent and credible way, with industry data scientists who can record objective measures of video game engagement. In this paper, we detail such a collaboration and report our investigation of the relation between the actual time people devote to playing a game and their subjective sense of well-being. We believe our study addresses the primary impediment to past research, delivers high-quality evidence that policymakers require, and provides a template for transparent, robust and credible research on games and health.

1.1. Video game behaviour

Globally speaking, the most contentious debates surrounding the potential effects of video game engagement are focused on the mental health of players. For example, the American Psychiatric Association did not identify any psychiatric conditions related to video games in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), but it does recommend Internet Gaming Disorder as a topic for further research [14]. The World Health Organization adopted a more definitive approach and included Gaming Disorder in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), emphasizing excessive play time as a necessary component [15]. In sharp contrast, the US Food and Drug Administration recently approved the use of a so-called ‘serious video game’ for treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, providing some evidence that there are mental health benefits of some kinds of play time [16]. These examples illustrate the central role video game engagement plays as a potential public health issue.

Given this, it is critical to understand that the quality of the evidence underlying possible classifications of video game play as potentially psychopathological has been criticized strongly. Many experts have argued that there is insufficient evidence that gaming disorder definitions and diagnostic tools meet clinical standards [15,1722]. Excessive use has been flagged as a key criterion for many gaming disorder definitions, yet researchers exclusively operationalize excessive use by way of self-reported estimates. This is an important shortcoming, as an increasing number of scholars are now aware that self-reported behaviour is a poor predictor of actual behaviour, particularly for technology use (e.g. [,23,24]). Self-reported video game play is thus an unsuitable proxy of actual video game play—yet researchers and those advising health bodies are depending on self-reports for diagnosis and policy decisions (e.g. [21]).

Although there have been calls for more direct measures of video game behaviour, these efforts have stalled because scientists do not have the resources or access to data necessary for independent scientific research. For example, on the issue of social media use and well-being, a UK parliamentary select committee called on ‘social media companies to make anonymized high-level data available, for research purposes’ in January 2019 [25]. A year later, another committee report on addictive and immersive digital technologies recommended that government ‘require games companies to share aggregated player data with researchers’ [26]. There is a need for collaborations between games companies and independent scientists, but we are unaware of any successful collaborations investigating player well-being. Game developers have in-house expertise in directly measuring video game engagement via telemetry—the automated logging of users’ interaction with content. But so far, efforts have been futile to connect with scientists who have experience in combining such telemetry data with methods that assess subjective well-being (e.g. surveys or experience sampling) and it is not clear if the data, collected for commercial purposes, could be applied to scientific ends.

Collaboration with industry partners not only has the promise to make objective player behaviours accessible for independent analysis; it also provides an opportunity to address a related problem which has plagued games research for decades: a lack of transparency and rigour. Much research in the quantitative social sciences does not share data for others to independently verify and extend findings (e.g. [27]). Sharing resources and data contribute to a more robust knowledge base [28,29]. It also gives other scientists, the public and policymakers the opportunity to better judge the credibility of research [30,31]. A lack of transparency allows selective reporting and thus contributes to unreliable findings that regularly fail to replicate (e.g. [3234]). Work by Elson & Przybylski [35] showed that this issue arises regularly in research focused on the effects of technology, including in video games research. Carras et al. [19] summarized systematic reviews on gaming disorder and found a high degree of selective reporting in the literature. To increase public trust in their findings, scientists have an obligation to work as transparently as possible, particularly when they collaborate with industry [36]. Greater transparency will provide a valuable tool for informing policy [3.7] and the heated academic debates that surround the global health impacts of games.

1.2. Video game behaviour and well-being

Research and policymakers have been interested in a wide range of mental health outcomes of video game play. Mental health comprises both negative mental health (e.g. depression) and positive mental health. Positive mental health can be further divided into emotional well-being (i.e. the affective component) and evaluative well-being (i.e. the cognitive component) [38]. Nearly all non-experimental studies examining the links between video games and mental health rely on subjective, self-reported estimates of video play time, either by players themselves or by parents. For example, Maras et al. [39] found a sizeable positive correlation between video game play time and depression in a large sample of Canadian adolescents. The focus of research is often on excessive or problematic video game use, routinely reporting positive correlations between problematic video games and mental health problems in both cross-sectional (e.g. [40]) and longitudinal designs (e.g. [41]).

Because self-reported technology use has shown to be a poor proxy of actual behaviour, such associations will necessarily be biased (e.g. [8]). The same caveat holds for research reporting both positive (e.g. [42]) and nonlinear (e.g. [43]) associations between video game play time and psychological functioning. For example, studies suggest that self-reported technology use can lead to both overestimates and underestimates of the association with well-being compared to directly logged technology use [44–46]. Therefore, our scientific understanding of video game effects is limited by our measures. In other words, the true association could be positive or negative, small or large, irrelevant or significant.

A handful of efforts have combined server logs with survey data [47]. However, these studies mainly used a network approach, modelling offline to online dynamics in leadership [48] and friendship formation in games [49]. Studies combining objective play and well-being are lacking. We need accurate, direct measures of play time to resolve the inconsistencies in the literature on well-being and to ensure the study of games and health is not as fruitless as the study of games and aggression [].

Whereas the perceptions of players in recalling their video game play time can introduce bias, a decade of research indicates perceptions of the psychological affordances provided by games are important to player experiences in games. According to self-determination theory, any activity whose affordances align with the motivations of people will contribute to their well-being [50]. Motivations can be intrinsic, driven by people’s interests and values which result in enjoyment, or extrinsic, inspired by rewards or a feeling of being pressured to do an activity. If an activity also satisfies basic psychological needs for competence, relatedness and autonomy, people will find the activity more motivating, enjoyable and immersive—ultimately leading to higher well-being.

The interplay of the affordances of video games, motivation and needs has shown to be important for subjective well-being. If a game satisfies basic needs people will experience more enjoyment and higher well-being [51]. Conversely, if those needs are not met, frustrated, or play is externally motivated, it is associated with lower psychological functioning [52]. In other words, how play time relates to well-being probably depends on players’ motivations and how the game satisfies basic needs. Player experience would thus moderate the association between play time and well-being: if players are intrinsically motivated and experience enjoyment during play, play time will most likely be positively associated with well-being [53,54]. By contrast, when players only feel extrinsic motivation and feel pressured to play, play time might have negative effects on well-being. Such a mechanism aligns well with a recent review that concludes that motivations behind play are likely to be a crucial moderator of the potential effect of play time on well-being [55,56]. However, it is unclear whether such a mechanism only holds true for self-reported play time and perceptions, or whether self-reported perceptions interact with directly measured play time.

1.3. This study

In this study, we investigate the relations between video games and positive mental health, namely affective well-being of players (from here on called well-being). We collaborated with two industry partners, Electronic Arts and Nintendo of America, and applied an approach grounded in an understanding that subjective estimates of play time are inaccurate and the motivational experiences of player engagement are important to well-being. To this end, we surveyed players of two popular video games: Plantsvs.Zombies: Battle for Neighborville and Animal Crossing: New Horizons. Our partners provided us with telemetry data of those players. The data allowed us to explore the association between objective play time and well-being, delivering a much-needed exploration of the relation between directly measured play behaviour and positive mental health. We also explored the role of player motivations in this relation, namely whether feelings of autonomy, relatedness, competence, enjoyment and extrinsic motivation interacted with play time.

In the light of calls for more transparency in the Social Sciences (e.g. [31]), we aimed for a transparent workflow to enable others to critically examine and build upon our work. We, therefore, provide access to all materials, data and code on the Open Science Framework (OSF) page of this project ( The analyses are documented at This documentation and the code have been archived on the OSF at

2. Method

2.1. Participants and procedure

For this project, we combined objective game telemetry data with survey responses. We did not conduct a priori power analyses. Instead, we followed recent recommendations and aimed to collect as many responses as we had resources for [57]. We surveyed the player base of two popular games: Plants vs. Zombies: Battle for Neighborville (PvZ) and Animal Crossing: New Horizons (AC:NH).

We designed a survey measuring players’ well-being, self-reported play and motivations for play, and discussed the survey structure with Electronic Arts. Electronic Arts (EA) programmed and hosted the survey on Decipher, an online survey platform, and sent invite emails to adult (at least 18 years old) PvZ players in the US, Canada and the UK. The survey was translated to French for French-speaking Canadians. Participants received an invitation to participate in the survey on the email address they had associated with their EA account. The email invited them to participate in a research project titled ‘Understanding Shifting Patterns of Videogame Play and Health Outcomes’. Participants were informed that the aim of the study was to investigate how people play video games and how they feel over time. We also informed them that Electronic Arts would link their survey responses to their play data. Further, the study information explained that the research team would act independently of Electronic Arts in data analysis and scientific reporting. We obtained ethical approval from our institute (SSH_OII_CIA_20_043) and all respondents gave informed consent. Participants could halt their participation at any time and did not receive compensation for their participation.

Electronic Arts then pulled telemetry game data of players that got invited in the first wave of data collection. They matched telemetry data with survey invitations by a securely hashed player ID. Afterwards, they transferred both the survey and the telemetry datasets to the researchers. Neither dataset contained personally identifiable information, only a hashed player ID that we used to link survey and telemetry data. Electronic Arts sent out the invitations in two waves. The first wave happened in early August 2020 and was sent to 50 000 player (response window: 48 h).1 We inspected the data quality of their telemetry and survey responses and checked whether the data were suitable to address our research questions. After confirming that the data were suitable and that we could join the telemetry and survey information, Electronic Arts sent out a second wave of invitations to 200 000 PvZ players from the same population at the end of September 2020 (response window: 96 h). In total, 518 PvZ players (approx. 0.21% response rate) finished the survey (Mage = 35, s.d.age = 12; 404 men, 94 women, two other, 17 preferred not to disclose their gender), of whom 471 had matching telemetry data.

For Animal Crossing: New Horizon (AC:NH) players, the procedure was similar. We hosted the survey with formr [58], an open source survey tool, and Nintendo of America sent invitations with survey links to a 342 825 adult players in the US on 27 October. The survey was identical to the one sent to PvZ players except for aesthetic differences. The response window was 7 days and in total, 6011 players responded (1.75% response rate; Mage = 31, s.d.age = 10; 3124 men, 2462 women, 153 other, 88 preferred not to disclose their gender). We then provided the hashed IDs of the survey respondents to Nintendo of America, who sent us the telemetry data for those players, of whom 2756 had telemetry within the two-week window. Neither the survey nor the telemetry data had any personally identifiable information. We followed the same workflow as described above and linked survey responses with play data.

2.2. Measures

2.2.1. Well-being

We assessed well-being with the validated scale of positive and negative experiences (SPANE, [59]), which measures the affective dimension of well-being [38]. We asked respondents to think about how they had been feeling in the past two weeks and report how often they experienced each of six positive and six negative feelings. Respondents could indicate the frequency of experiencing those feelings on a scale from 1 (Very rarely or never) to 7 (Very often or always). We then took the mean of the positive feelings and negative feelings and subtracted the negative affect mean score from the positive affect mean score to obtain a measure of well-being (figure 1).

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Histograms of central variables. The y-axis indicates counts of responses in each bin, scaled to the bin with greatest number of responses. Top frequencies indicate PvZ players’ responses, bottom frequencies indicate AC:NH players’ responses. Small triangles indicate means.
2.2.2. Player experience and need satisfaction

We assessed player experiences and motivations with the player experience and need satisfaction scale (PENS, [51]), which has recently been validated [60]. We asked respondents to rate items reflecting on when they had been playing PvZ/AC:NH in the past two weeks on a scale from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 7 (Strongly agree). The scale consisted of five subscales. Participants reported their sense of autonomy on three items such as ‘I experienced a lot of freedom in [PvZ/AC:NH]’; their sense of competence on three items such as ‘I felt competent at [PvZ/AC:NH]’; their sense of relatedness on items such as ‘I found the relationships I formed in [PvZ/AC:NH] fulfilling’, but only when they reported to have played with others, either online or in couch co-op, in the past two weeks. They also reported their enjoyment with four items such as ‘I think [PvZ/AC:NH] was fun to play’ and their extrinsic motivation on four items such as ‘I played [PvZ/AC:NH] to escape’.

2.2.3. Self-reported play

Participants also reported how much total time they estimated to have spent playing the game in the past two weeks on two open numerical fields, where they could report hours and minutes (figure 2). We transformed both to total time in hours.2 For PvZ, the Decipher survey platform restricted the maximum time players could report to 40 h 59 min. Such large values were rare and affected only a handful of participants. The AC:NH time scale was unrestricted.

Figure 2.
Figure 2. Histograms of actual play time (solid; top) and subjective estimates of play time (light; bottom) for both games. Small triangles indicate means over participants who had data for both variables. The x-axis in this figure is truncated at 80 h to make the bulk of the values easier to discern. 65 AC:NH time values (7 [0.3%; max = 99.8] actual, 58 [1.0%; max = 161.0] estimated) were above this cut-off and are therefore not shown on this figure.
2.2.4. Telemetry

Telemetry data for both games were available in different levels of granularity. For both PvZ and AC:NH, the games companies provided game sessions per player over the two-week window before finishing the survey. Each game session had a start time and an end time. For example, when a player turned on their console, launched PvZ and entered the game hub world (where they can select what type of level or mode to play), opening the hub world counted as the start time. However, determining an end time can be difficult. Players could immediately play another round, return to the hub world, take a break while leaving the game on etc. Therefore, there were instances where game sessions for a given player overlapped (e.g. two game sessions had the same start time, but different end times). In such cases, we condensed multiple overlapping game sessions into one game session, taking the game start time that the sessions shared and the last end time. As a result, players had multiple unique game sessions without overlap. Afterwards, we aggregated the durations of all game sessions per player to obtain the total objective time they spent playing the game in the two-week window before they filled out the survey. In the case of AC:NH, Nintendo of America provided telemetry including game session start and end times, as well as session durations. Start and end times were not always accurate for the same reasons as with PvZ, but we used them in order to only use the session information from the two weeks preceding the survey. However, the session durations were verified by the Nintendo of America Team. Therefore, we aggregated durations in the two weeks preceding the survey per participant for AC:NH (figure 2). Readers can find more details on data processing on

PvZ telemetry featured fine-grained records of game events. The data contained information on the game mode of a game session (e.g. online or split screen), the levels a player played in during a game session, and the game type (i.e. single player versus multiplayer). Furthermore, there were indicators of how a player fared during a game session, such as total kill counts, death counts, scores, total damage dealt, shots fired and hit, and critical hit counts. PvZ telemetry also contained information on a player’s progression, such as when a player gained a level, how much XP they gained, and when they gained a prestige level. Last, there were measures of social interactions with other players, such as what in-game gestures a player used and when they became in-game friends with other players. We did not analyse these data or report on them here. Readers can find them on the OSF page of this article.

2.3. Statistical analysis

Before analysis, we first excluded data from players who gave the same response to all SPANE and motivations items (PvZ: 1 [0.2%]; AC:NH: 8 [0.1%]). This so-called straight lining is an indicator of poor data quality [61]. We then identified as outliers all observations that were more than six standard deviations away from the variable’s mean. We aimed to exclude as few data points as possible, which is why we did not follow the common rule of thumb of three standard deviations and only identify truly extreme, implausible values. We replaced those extreme values with missing values to not bias resulting analyses. For PvZ, 1 (0.2%) objective play time values were excluded. For AC:NH, 12 (0.2%) actual and 40 (0.7%) estimated play time values were excluded. In the models reported below, play time refers to units of 10 h, and the well-being and motivation variables were standardized. Note that the sample sizes per analysis will differ because of missing values either due to exclusions, not having telemetry data, or not having played socially (i.e. no responses on relatedness). We conducted all statistical analyses with R (v. 4.0.3, [62]).

3. Results

3.1. Play time and affective well-being

We first focused on the relationships among objective and subjective play time, and well-being. The actual and estimated play times are shown in figure 2. On average, participants overestimated their play time (PvZ: M = 1.6, s.d. = 11.8; AC:NH: M = 0.5, s.d. = 15.8).

Then, to better understand how actual and estimated play times were related, we regressed the subjective estimates of play time on objective play time. This correlation was positive (PvZ: β = 0.34, 95%CI [0.27, 0.41], R2 = 0.15, N = 469; AC:NH: β = 0.49, 95%CI [0.45, 0.54] R2 = 0.16, N = 2714; figure 3a). Readers can find the full regression tables on

Figure 3.
Figure 3. (a) Relationship between the objective time played and participants’ estimates of the time spent playing. Points indicate individuals, solid line and shade are the regression line and its 95%CI. The dashed line indicates a perfect relationship. (b) Relationship between the objective time spent playing, and well-being. (c) Relationship between participants’ estimated time spent playing and well-being.
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Unblocked Games 66 EZ – Play Whimsical Games Anywhere In The World



Unblocked Games 66 EZ – Play Whimsical Games Anywhere In The World

Unblocked Games 66 EZ enthusiasts are everywhere in the world, from Mario Cart to Overwatch and other outstanding and engaging games, players have a variety of options to choose from and play.

But when it comes to online gaming there are very few websites that provide a good collection of games that can cater to the need of multiple players’ interests.

Although, if a website has a good games collection, being it not available in your region might be a big problem. But there is a solution to every problem.

Here in this content, you will discover Unblocked Games 66 EZ – a website for all your gaming needs.

Explore The Thrills Of Unblocked Games 66 EZ

Unblocked Games 66 EZ is a website that provides a collection of online games that can be played in school or work environments where gaming websites may be restricted or blocked. The term “unblocked” refers to the fact that the games available on the platform are accessible.

The website provides a vast range of games across multiple genres, including action, puzzles, sports, and more. It aims to offer an enjoyable gaming experience for users who want to play the games during their leisure hours or when they have some downtime at school or work and want to immerse themselves into an action world, using.

Reasons Unblocked Games 66 EZ Is A Perfect Website To Play Games

There are many reasons why one should play games through Unblocked Games 66 EZ, some of which are mentioned below.

Access in restricted environmentsVariety of gamesConvenience and ease of use
●       The primary benefit of using the website is that it allows you to access and play games in a strict environment where the gaming website usually is blocked or restricted.●       This can include schools, colleges, or offices that have imposed restrictions on gaming content.●       This website provides a workaround to enjoy the favorite games of players during their breaks.●       Unblocked Games 66 EZ also has a wide selection of games in different genres and provides options for various preferences and interests.●       Whether you want to play action-packed adventures, mind-simulating puzzles, strategic challenges, or casual sports games, the platform aims to cater to diverse gaming tastes.●       The website is designed to be user-friendly with a simple and intuitive interface.●       All games are easily accessible, and you can start playing with just a few clicks.●       The players also don’t have to download or install anything. And this makes Unblocked Games 66 EZ a quick and hassle-free option to enjoy outstanding games on the go.

Explore Elated Genres To Play At Unblocked Games 66 EZ

The website offers a wide range of game genres to cater needs of multiple players with different interests. Some popular genres of games available on the website are;

Action:  The games mostly involve fast-paced gameplay, combat, and multiple challenges that need quick reflexes and decision-making.

Adventure: This genre has games that are focused on exploration, puzzle-solving, and storytelling. They feature immersive narratives and allow players to embark on exciting quests or journeys.

Puzzle: Puzzle games need problem-solving skills and logical thinking. They mostly include manipulating objects, solving riddles, or competing patterns to progress through levels.

Strategy: Strategy games are focused on tactical planning and decision-making. Players typically manage resources, build structures, and lead armies or civilizations to progress the story.  

Sports: This genre of games simulates various sports and allows the players to participate in the virtual version of activities including tennis, basketball, football, and more.

Racing: Racing games center around high-sped competition, where Racing games center around high-speed competition, where players control vehicles and strive to win races, beat lap times, or complete challenges on different tracks.

Arcade:  These games are usually fast-paced, straightforward, and easy to pick up and usually feature simple controls, high scores, and quick sessions.

Platform:  Platform games involve navigating through levels that are filled usually with obstacles enemies, and puzzles. The goal in these games is to reach the end of the level or defeat the villain.

Shooting: Shooting games are centered on combat and precision shooting. The players control a character or vehicle and engage in battles against their enemies

Simulation: These games are focused on replicating a real-life activity or experience. This may include simulation of driving, flying, managing cities, or running a business.

Why Unblocked Games 66 EZ Not Working?

Although the website is designed to work in a restricted environment still there are various reasons that it might not work in your device or area you are in. If you are experiencing any errors while operating the website for games, then you might have the following problems.

1.     Network restrictions

There is a chance that the website is blocked or restricted by the network you are using. There are several schools, colleges, workplaces, or even public networks that often have filters or firewalls to prevent access to gaming websites or specific categories of content.

2.     Server or website maintenance

You might face the issue because the website might be down temporarily or exercising any server issues. This can happen occasionally and the administrator of the website might be working to resolve the problem.

3.     Website blocked by your browser

Also, it is possible that your web browser might have some setting or extension to block certain websites. For this, you can check browser settings or any installed extensions to ensure that they are not blocking the gaming website.

4.     Domain changes or errors

Sometimes website changes their domain names or URLs which temporarily leads to unavailability. You can double-check that you have the correct URL for Unblocked Games 66 WZ.

5.     Legal or copyright issues

Website offering unblocked gamest may face challenges or copyright issues sometimes which leads to their shutdown or inaccessibility.

How To Access Unblocked Games 66 EZ?

What to do if you cannot access Unblocked Games 66 EZ? Well! If you are facing temporary issues then it can be solved by the administrator of the website. But if the issues are related to geo-blocking and network interruptions, then there are some solutions that you can try.

Use a different network

If you are trying to access the website from a school, college, or workplace network where gaming websites are blocked, then you can try using a different network. This can be your home network or public network that doesn’t have the same restrictions.

Utilize a VPN service

A VPN is a solution for too many problems when it comes to blocked content. With a VPN service, you can easily bypass network restrictions by routing the internet connection through a different server in a different location. By doing this it can make it appear as if you are accessing the website from a different location, such as another country.

Check for alternative URLs or mirrors

If the website’s domain has been changed or is experiencing any issues then there might be alternative or mirror sites available. You can look for the official announcements or forum related to the Unblocked Games 66 EZ where you can find information about accessing a game.

Use mobile data or personal hotspot

If you have mobile data on your device or create a personal hotspot, then you can easily connect your device to it and access the website through your mobile network.

Look for similar websites

You can also look for similar websites that provide the same collection of games and similar services. Search online or explore the forums and other platforms where you can get information about reasonable alternatives.

Get Access To Unblocked Games 66 EZ With FastestVPN

VPN or virtual private network is the best way to access Unblocked Games 66 EZ. With a good VPN service provider, you easily connect and have access to your favorite games on the website. There are multiple benefits of using a VPN to access the website even though it is unrestricted in your location, it might help you with other things.

So, if you want to enjoy a great gaming experience at Unblocked Games 66 EZ, then using the VPN is the best option.

There are many options available for VPNs to use but if you are looking for something authentic and reliable then FastestVPN is the perfect choice for it. Through this VPN you can enjoy the best gaming experience that you might not experience because and have access to any game that is blocked in your region.

With FastestVPN, everything will be secure and private. You don’t have to announce your identity to anyone while playing games on the Unblocked Games 66 EZ.

Enhance Your Gaming Experience At Unblocked Games 66 EZ With The FastestVPN

The FastestVPN features and facilities are there that are helpful for its users and make it convenient for them to use and browse Unblocked Games 66 EZ.

Compatibility With 20+ Devices

You can easily use FastestVPN with 20+ devices including Android, iPhone, Windows, Xbox, PS4, Roku, and more. You can easily play games at Unblocked Games 66 EZ on any device you have.

DNS Leak Protection

It sends the IP requests outside the VPN tunnel, exposing your IP. FastestVPN makes sure high security with DNS leak protection features that is built-in so you can play Unblocked Games 66 EZ without any problem.

Internet Kill Switch

An internet kill switch helps in preventing the identity of the user which means that if you are playing Unblocked Games 66 EZ no one will identify you.

Multiple Protocols

FastestVPN has different protocols, for example, OpenVPN, WireGaurd, IPSec, IKEv2, OpenConnect, L2TP, and more which makes it easy to play games without any problem.

Ad Blocker

The VPN gives you access to an Ad-blocker which means that you will be allowed to play your favorite at the website Unblocked Games 66 EZ.

Wi-Fi Security

If you are playing games through Unlocked Games 66 EZ on a public WIFI, then FastestVPN will provide you with an extremely secure connection.

AES 256-Bit Encryption

The FastestVPN protects the data you will upload on Unblocked Games 66 EZ whether it is your email id, username, password, or anything else.

Access Unblocked Games 66 EZ Anywhere

It is already mentioned that FastestVPN will help you access Unblocked Games 66 EZ anywhere in the world.

Anti-Malware Protection

This feature is best to protect your device, connection, and data with high-end malware prevention and you are allowed to browse the Unblocked Games 66 EZ securely.


So, it becomes much easier to play games at Unblocked Games 66 EZ with FastestVPN. With multiple genres to choose from, you can play whatever you want anonymously. FastestVPN hosted a lot of benefits for its users and became a convenient option to choose from.

Continue Reading


Kahoot: Revolutionizing Learning through Gamification



Kahoot: Revolutionizing Learning through Gamification

Discover how Kahoot, the gamified learning platform, is transforming education and engaging students like never before. Explore the numerous benefits and uses of Kahoot, its impact on learning outcomes, and expert insights.

Introduction: Welcome to the World of Kahoot!

Gamification has taken the world of education by storm, and one platform stands out among the rest: Kahoot. This article dives deep into the phenomenon of Kahoot, how it has redefined learning, and the transformative impact it has had on students and educators alike. Let’s explore this innovative tool, its features, and how it is revolutionizing the way we learn and teach.

Kahoot: A Game-Changer for Education

Kahoot is an interactive game-based learning platform that enables educators to create engaging quizzes, surveys, and discussions to captivate learners of all ages. By incorporating gamification elements, Kahoot transforms traditional classroom experiences into fun and interactive sessions that foster active participation and knowledge retention.

Key Features of Kahoot

Kahoot’s success lies in its user-friendly interface and an array of exciting features. Here are some of its key elements:

1. Kahoot Quizzes: The Power of Playful Assessments

Kahoot quizzes are a powerful tool to assess students’ knowledge while keeping them entertained. These quizzes can be tailored to cover various subjects and are an excellent way to reinforce learning outcomes.

2. Kahoot Surveys: Gathering Insights from the Learners

The platform allows educators to create surveys, providing valuable insights into students’ opinions and understanding of the material. This feedback aids in refining teaching strategies and improving the learning experience.

3. Kahoot Discussions: Encouraging Collaborative Learning

Kahoot discussion feature encourages students to participate actively, promoting collaboration and teamwork. Students can express their ideas, ask questions, and engage in meaningful dialogues.

4. Kahoot Challenges: Friendly Competition for Enhanced Learning

Kahoot Challenges enable students to compete against each other or themselves, motivating them to strive for improvement. This healthy competition adds excitement to the learning process.

5. Kahoot Creator: Empowering Educators

With the Kahoot Creator, educators can unleash their creativity and design custom learning activities that suit their teaching objectives and students’ needs.

6. Kahoot Reports: Measuring Progress and Identifying Gaps

Kahoot’s detailed reports offer valuable insights into students’ performance, helping educators gauge their progress and address areas that need improvement.

The Impact of Kahoot on Education

Kahoot’s gamified approach has had a significant impact on education, transforming classrooms and engaging learners in unprecedented ways.

Empowering Learners and Increasing Motivation

Kahoot’s interactive nature captivates learners, making the learning experience enjoyable and engaging. Students actively participate, as they are motivated by the competitive and rewarding aspects of the platform.

Fostering Active Learning

The platform promotes active learning, where students take an active role in the learning process. This approach leads to improved retention and a deeper understanding of the subject matter.

Enhancing Knowledge Retention

Gamification has been proven to enhance knowledge retention. Kahoot quizzes and challenges reinforce learning, making it more likely for students to remember the material.

Encouraging Collaboration and Teamwork

Kahoot’s discussion feature encourages students to collaborate and share ideas. It fosters teamwork and communication skills, preparing students for real-world challenges.

Creating Inclusive Learning Environments

Kahoot’s inclusivity allows every student to participate at their own pace and ability level, ensuring that no one is left behind.

The Versatility of Kahoot: Beyond the Classroom

Kahoot’s impact extends beyond the traditional classroom setting. It has found applications in various fields, showcasing its versatility.

Corporate Training

In the corporate world, Kahoot is employed for employee training programs, making learning engaging and effective.

Social Events and Gatherings

Kahoot adds an element of fun to social gatherings, family events, and parties. It is a great icebreaker and conversation starter.

Remote Learning

Especially during times of remote learning, Kahoot has proven to be a valuable tool for educators to keep students engaged and connected.

FAQs About Kahoot

1. How Can I Create a Kahoot Quiz?

Creating a Kahoot quiz is simple. Just log in to your Kahoot account, click on the “Create” button, and follow the easy steps to customize your quiz.

2. Can I Use Images and Videos in My Kahoot Quiz?

Yes, you can! Kahoot allows you to add images and videos to your quiz questions to make them more interactive and visually appealing.

3. Is Kahoot Suitable for All Age Groups?

Absolutely! Kahoot is designed to cater to learners of all ages, from young students to adult professionals.

4. Can I Track Students’ Progress on Kahoot?

Yes, Kahoot provides detailed reports on students’ performance and progress, helping educators assess their learning outcomes.

5. Is Kahoot Secure and Privacy-Friendly?

Kahoot takes privacy and security seriously, ensuring that user data is protected and only accessible by authorized individuals.

6. Can I Use Kahoot for Non-Educational Purposes?

Certainly! Kahoot can be utilized for various non-educational purposes, such as team-building activities or fun social events.

Conclusion: Embracing the Power of Kahoot

Kahoot has revolutionized the learning experience by gamifying education. Its user-friendly features, impact on motivation, and versatility have made it a game-changer for both educators and learners. Embrace the power of Kahoot to create engaging and interactive learning environments, driving positive learning outcomes and preparing students for a brighter future.

Continue Reading


Diablo 4 Early Reviews: A Promising Return to the Dark Fantasy Realm



Diablo 4 Early Reviews: A Promising Return to the Dark Fantasy Realm

Upgrade your Diablo 4 experience with U7BUY’s secure and cheap Diablo 4 Items on Diablo 4, the highly anticipated installment in Blizzard Entertainment’s iconic action role-playing game series, has finally graced the gaming world with its presence. With its dark fantasy setting, immersive gameplay, and a legacy that spans over two decades, the expectations for Diablo 4 were sky-high. As early reviews start pouring in, let’s delve into the initial impressions and see if the game lives up to the hype.

Captivating Atmosphere and Visuals

One aspect that immediately captures the attention of players is Diablo 4’s atmospheric world. The game’s developers have masterfully crafted a dark and foreboding realm that feels both familiar and fresh. The gothic-inspired art direction, coupled with stunning graphics, creates a visually striking experience. From the hauntingly beautiful landscapes to the meticulously detailed character models, Diablo 4 offers an immersive visual feast that draws players deeper into its sinister world.

Multiplayer and Social Features

Diablo 4 embraces its multiplayer heritage, offering both cooperative and competitive gameplay options. Players can team up with friends to tackle challenging dungeons, engage in PvP combat, or participate in large-scale world events. The social features have been expanded, allowing players to form guilds, trade Diablo 4 items, and engage in community-driven activities. This focus on multiplayer interaction fosters a sense of camaraderie among players and enhances the longevity of the game.

Evolution of Gameplay

Diablo 4 builds upon the foundations set by its predecessors, blending the best elements of the series while introducing exciting new features. The gameplay retains the fast-paced combat and addictive loot-driven progression that fans adore, but with notable improvements. The skill system has been revamped, offering more customization options and empowering players to create unique character builds. Additionally, the introduction of open-world elements adds a sense of exploration and adventure, providing a refreshing departure from the linear progression of previous titles.

Engaging Storytelling and Lore

One aspect that has always set the Diablo series apart is its captivating storytelling and rich lore. Diablo 4 continues this tradition, delivering a compelling narrative that plunges players into a dark and morally complex world. The game explores the origins of evil, delving deep into the mythos of the series and unraveling the mysteries that have intrigued players for years. Engaging quests, memorable characters, and morally ambiguous choices add depth to the storyline, making it an engaging and immersive experience.

Constructive Criticism

Despite the overwhelmingly positive reception, Diablo 4 is not without its minor flaws. Some early reviews have mentioned occasional technical issues, such as minor bugs or optimization concerns. However, it’s worth noting that these issues are not game-breaking and can likely be resolved through post-launch patches. Additionally, a few players have expressed a desire for more character classes at launch, although Blizzard has confirmed plans for additional classes through future updates.

The early reviews of Diablo 4 suggest that the game is a triumphant return to form for the beloved series. With its captivating atmosphere, engaging gameplay, and immersive storytelling, Diablo 4 appears to be a worthy successor to its predecessors. While minor technical issues may exist, they don’t detract significantly from the overall experience. As the game continues to evolve and Blizzard addresses any concerns, it’s clear that Diablo 4 has the potential to become a new pinnacle in the action RPG genre, satisfying both long-time fans and newcomers alike.

Continue Reading